Reconsidering the Harvard Medical Practice Study Conclusions About The Validity of Medical Malpractice Claims: A Literature Review
نویسنده
چکیده
Over fifteen years after first reporting to the State of New York, the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS) continues to have a significant impact in medical malpractice policy debates. In those debates the HMPS has come to stand for four main propositions. First, “medical injury ... accounts for more deaths than all other kinds of accidents combined” and “more than a quarter of those were caused by substandard care.” Second, the vast majority of people who are injured as result of substandard care do not file a claim. Third, “a substantial majority of malpractice claims filed are not based on provider carelessness or even iatrogenic injury.” Fourth, “whether negligence or a medical injury had occurred ... bore little relation to the outcome of the claims.” In light of this continuing reliance on the HMPS and the follow up closed claim study, this article reviews the evidence regarding their findings about the validity of medical malpractice claims. The results of this review are as follows: First, the finding that most eligible people do not bring medical malpractice claims is well supported and confirmed by other studies using both similar and very different research methods. Second, the finding that most medical malpractice claims are not based on either iatrogenic injury or provider negligence stands on a small and precarious empirical base. Indeed, the HMPS data are as likely to support a very different finding, namely that most malpractice claims are reasonably related to medical management injuries and provider negligence. Finally, the finding from the follow-up closed claim study rests on an even weaker base and is contradicted by a large body of research on closed medical malpractice claims. In fact, the research reviewed in part IIIB of this article suggests that the legal system filters out most of the weaker claims.
منابع مشابه
Reconsidering the Harvard Medical Practice Study conclusions about the validity of medical malpractice claims.
متن کامل
Survey medical malpractice in Laser application in medical science refer to forensic medicine during 1395-1399 in Tehran, Iran
Introduction: Today, laser technology is an integral part of medicine, medical malpractice is a major problem in healthcare systems.the purpose of present study was investigation of common causes of injuries, claims, and decisions related to medical malpractice claims related to Laser-therapy. Methods: investigation of legal documents in the coroner’s Office of Forensic Medicine, province of Te...
متن کاملRelation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS By matching the medical records of a random sample of 31,429 patients hospitalized in New York State in 1984 with statewide data on medical-malpractice claims, we identified patients who had filed claims against physicians and hospitals. These results were then compared with our findings, based on a review of the same medical records, regarding the incidence of injuries t...
متن کاملInvestigation of causes and effects of malpractice claims against dentists judged in Rasht medical council, 2006 – 2011
Introduction: Medical claim is one of the most concerning subjects for both patients and physicians. In addition, it has lots of financial and nonfinancial costs for health care systems. To define the number and causes of medical claims against dentists of Rasht since 2006 till 2011in Guilan medical council. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross - sectional study was performed since 200...
متن کاملA systematic review and meta-analysis of medical malpractice studies in Iran
Background: Medical malpractice is a serious problem in the health care system. This study aimed to review the medical negligence in Iran. Methods: Based on the PRISMA checklist, a search for scientific records was done separately by two researchers. All the articles that had selection criteria were evaluated in terms of methodological quality. Medical malpractice was assessed in four main div...
متن کامل